RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘fantasy writing’

Scott F. Gray on Fantasy Collaboration

13 Aug

Endlands: Prayer For Dead Kings by Scott F. GrayScott Fitzgerald Gray has been flogging his imagination professionally since deciding he wanted to be a writer and abandoning any hope of a real career in about the fourth grade. That was the year that speculative fiction and fantasy kindled his voracious appetite for literary escapism and a love of roleplaying gaming that still drives his questionable creativity. In addition to his fantasy and speculative fiction writing, Scott has dabbled in feature film and television, was a finalist for the Jim Burt Screenwriting Prize from the Writers’ Guild of Canada, and currently consults and story edits on projects ranging from overly obscure indie-Canadian fare to Neill Blomkamp’s somewhat less-obscure “District 9” and the upcoming “Elysium.”

A Prayer for Dead Kings and Other Tales is the current centerpiece for the shared world mentioned in this post (the Endlands). Scott’s latest book is We Can Be Heroes.

More info on Scott and his work (some of it even occasionally truthful) can be found by reading between the lines at insaneangel.com.

Endlands

Writing has a reputation as a singular kind of pursuit. We writers are all supposed to be lonely, broken figures locked in our garret workspaces, blindly pursuing our personal muse while our families fret and pace in the drawing room downstairs. And while there’s a part of me that would love to live the life of an 18th-century literary cliche, I don’t fit that mold overly well. Because my creative process and my history of making a kind of living as a writer has been largely shaped around the idea of collaboration.

My writing career started out in Canadian film, where I worked in screenwriting for a number of years, made a pretty good living, and ultimately quit because none of the projects I actually cared about were getting made. But when you work as a screenwriter, you pretty quickly embrace the idea that screenwriting is a highly collaborative process. At its worst, screenwriting is the experience of having your ideas beaten down and second-guessed by people who can’t do what you do (but that’s a topic for a different post, probably). But at its best — which I’ve been fortunate enough to see a fair bit of — screenwriting is about a shared creative vision. It’s about making your own ideas stronger and sharper by the process of having other people add to them. It’s about recognizing specific limitations and having to focus the work to adapt to them. It’s about hearing other people’s ideas and riffing off those ideas to come up with ideas you never would have thought of on your own.

A lot of years later, I spend a lot of my time working in collaboration with a ton of other people as a freelance editor and occasional designer for the Dungeons & Dragons game. I write fantasy and speculative fiction, most of which takes place in a shared world of my own creation (the Endlands). There’s a lot to be said for the single-author worlds that all epic-fantasy fans are familiar with, from Middle Earth to Westeros to the lands of the Wheel of Time. But for me, the richness of some of the most memorable fantasy worlds owes itself to the collaborative process by which those worlds were built. The Forgotten Realms, Dragonlance, and Eberron are shared worlds that most fantasy fans with a gaming background know of. Other literary examples include “Thieves’ World” and C.J. Cherryh’s “Merovingen Nights” books. And don’t forget what’s probably the grandfather of shared-world fantasy, the Hyborian Age — created by Robert E. Howard but vastly expanded upon by DeCamp and Carter, Roy Thomas, Kurt Busiek and Tim Truman, and many more.

For those who haven’t worked in a shared-world creative milieu, I think it’s easy to assume that it must be hard for a writer to feel good about having to give up some of the autonomy that creativity so often demands. But here’s a lame analogy. I know pretty much nothing about music, but the process of writing in a collaborative environment has always struck me as probably being something like what it feels like to play in a really great band. You as an individual might be great at what you do, but being able to riff off of the ideas and explorations of other people can take what you do to a whole new level. And in this lame analogy, the writer who absolutely can’t stand to have his or her work and ideas subjected to scrutiny, to suggestion, to the confines of history and culture that didn’t spring fully formed from his or her own mind is kind of like the lead guitarist who needs to constantly shred without worrying about what the rest of the band is doing. Or what song is even being played.

For me, there’s something special about worlds crafted through collaboration, because there’s something special about the process of collaboration — and of how that process sharpens, rather than dulls, individual creativity. RPG designers and shared-world authors work through a similar kind of process. All of those same things that are the best parts of screenwriting are wrapped up in the shared-world creative exchange that is game design and tie-in fiction — making your own ideas stronger and sharper, focusing in response to limitations, riffing off of other peoples’ creativity. In a screenwriting context, one has to balance the full scope of the imagination against writing within a production budget or having to make use of specific locations because those are the only locations available. In a shared-world writing, you balance all the things you could possibly do with existing canon and history — with the rules of the world as they’ve been laid down by the writers and designers who came before you.

There’s a great satisfaction in being the creator of pure ideas, for sure. But for me, there’s a different kind of equally great satisfaction that comes from being part of a process of ideas and creativity that’s greater than what I could accomplish on my own. And despite having the freedom as a writer and indie publisher to do whatever the hell I want with no input from or control by anyone else, I will happily continue to collaborate until the day I die.

 

 

Behind the words: the metaphysics of The Tale of the Lifesong

17 Mar

After reading and reviewing both books in my epic fantasy series, David Wagner threw some interesting challenges my way. Continue the mini-series as we delve into the world behind the words (previous posts dealt with themes and characters). Required reading for this assignment: The Riddler’s Gift and Second Sight. Deeper into the Tale of the Lifesong we go!

The search for illumination begins by observing the behaviour of lightDW:  In both of your novels, you certainly demonstrate that you have a solid grasp on, and deep understanding of, many (what could be called) “Biblical” concepts – far more so than many “Christian” authors I know of/have read.

I don’t believe it is necessary to study religion to find understanding; all you need is within yourself. If I display a grasp of ‘Biblical’ concepts that is coincidental as I don’t claim any knowledge of the contents of your Bible, which I tried to read but found the writing style obscured my inner sight. All I have done is to reflect on the world I see through the eyes of my soul.  I have allowed ideas to come through me rather than from me.

DW: One of my favorites was the idea of the wildfire revealing who you are on the inside, transforming you so that your inward nature is directly reflected by your outward appearance. You addressed this in part in your web post “The Lifesong and the Search for Truth”.

I suspect that would be a horror for most people, as would the presence of a telepath nearby. I doubt any of us would look very beautiful with our inner nature and thoughts on display. But a beautiful soul is something worth striving for, isn’t it? The state of our soul is our own special secret creation. That makes life a journey, rather than an achievement.

I am wary of people who claim to have ‘found’ the way to enlightenment. People are clever enough to puzzle out their own path. But we can all do with some inspiration to get us moving in the right direction, so if you are a singer, sing! If you are a writer: write!

DW: Please know that I absolutely am not going to try to engage you in a religious discussion, and will by no means attempt to foist my own set of beliefs upon you… I was only curious if your Atheism has been from your youth, or do you come from a religious background, which you subsequently left? I’m only curious because of your remarkable grasp on many underlying concepts that I feel have been obfuscated/hidden and are sorely needed among those that claim to follow Christ.

I appreciate your considerate approach. You are the kind of Christian I get on very well with. My wife is Roman Catholic, my best friend at school became a pastor; both understand religion is a personal path. To me, the sensation of spirit doesn’t imply worship is appropriate. I choose to walk alone. And my atheism is definitely not spelled with a capital A; I don’t use it to classify or limit myself.

I have been an atheist since about thirteen, when I worked out for myself that going to church wasn’t right and proper for me, it was a one-sided dialogue and simply traditional. Before that I wasn’t Christian, I was too young to know what Christian was. After that, I was the kid at school who refused to sing the hymns. I guess I’ve finally found a way to change the words ;-)

In the Tale of the Lifesong, I present a world that has entranced my inner eye. That you find deep concepts in it is due to the fact that you are able to see them in any world, I don’t believe it’s due to any special ability on my behalf of being able to express them, but thanks for the compliment.

I aim to be ‘true’ in my telling of the story; I am guided by my sense of ‘off-key’ notes, which I try to reshape into a harmony. I believe the less we explain in our stories and the more that it is up to the interpretation of the reader, the more powerful those interpretations can become because they are moments of discovered truth, entirely personal and (hopefully) therefore genuinely enlightening, rather than just dazzling displays of intellectual wizardry.

In the Lifesong, I seek to understand the magic I sense whispering under the surface of life, the essence of a beautiful song. That some people enjoy sharing my journey of discovery is a bonus. Maybe we are not that different, after all.

 
3 Comments

Posted in Lifesong

 

Behind the words: Developing the characters of the Tale of the Lifesong

09 Mar

After reading and reviewing both books in my epic fantasy series, David Wagner threw some interesting challenges my way. Continue the mini-series as we delve into the world behind the words (the previous post was on themes). Required reading for this assignment: The Riddler’s Gift and Second Sight. Deeper into the Tale of the Lifesong we go!

DW:  Ametheus is a terrific character, and it is probably impossible to recall exactly how he evolved in your mind, while you were developing him, but I’d love to know how you came up with the three facets, and assigning one to focus on the past, one the present and the third on the future. I’d love to know if you felt that type of dichotomy (trichotomy?) was merely a byproduct of pure chaos, or at its heart.

This trichotomy is at the heart of existence. We were, we are, we will be. It’s easy to understand Ametheus because we have may have some similar qualities ourselves: the part that lives in the past, holds grudges and is easy to anger, the part that lives in the future and maybe overestimates the amazing talents we have yet to reveal, and the humble part that lives in the Now and is maybe not quite what we want to be.

I really don’t develop these characters in the sense you are thinking of. I sink deeper into them. I try to understand who they are, and reveal it, rather than saying to myself ‘here’s Mr X, he’s going to be a placeholder representing un-love, despair and wrath’. I get flashes of inspiration, then work to understand the gift of vision I have been given.

The Shadowcaster, Kirjath ArkellDW:  Why did you decide to bring back Kirjath for Second Sight? He was such a terrific villain in the first volume, was it just hard to let him go? Ametheus doesn’t really factor in until they leave Oldenworld — did you feel the beginning of the book lacked enough tension without a true villain?

No, I closed my eyes, and there I was, floating above the grave thinking ‘how dare they bury me?’ And so I ventured forth, and tried to survive, with my failing essence, and my bitter need. You cannot kill me, you cretins.

DW:  Would King Mellar have gone mad anyway if Kirjath’s spirit had not ‘possessed’ him?

Yes, it comes from taking away the crutch he has used all his adult life. If you become familiar with projecting stability and order through such a powerful talisman, when it is removed from you the contrast would surely induce paranoia and madness. It is the fatal flaw of relying on Order (or becoming too powerful or famous — you never want to give it up). But without Kirjath, Mellar’s madness would not be so very dangerous. We’ll see how that plays out in a new tale of the Lifesong, perhaps?

DW:  Ashley’s “power” seems to be presented in a much more subtle way than Tabitha’s, yet it seemed (to me, anyway) to be every bit as unique/powerful. Did you plan on making Ashley a new Wizard from the outset, or was that a happy development along the way?

You might remember a slip of the tongue by the Riddler very early on that might begin the change in Eyri. The Darkmaster, Ashley, and Tabitha are touched by the flux. Take it from there… I didn’t intend for them to become wizards, but someone else did.

DW: Loved what you did with Ashley and Sassraline. It was fascinating to watch you deal with the issues of lying in order to save one’s skin, using flattery as a tool of manipulation, and also the nature of worship to begin with.

Flattering dragons is what you’re supposed to do, according to legend. The spin here is that he really has to make it believable, because he’s communicating with thoughts not words, so he can’t really lie, he has to find a truth that creates the desired effect.

DW: Ashley’s ability to project ideas/illusions into the minds of others, did you know he’d be able to do that from the outset (and saved that for the right time) or did that present itself as you wrote the scene of Sassraline’s humbling?

Sit in a cave with a hungry dragon long enough and you’ll come up with a solution. Or get eaten. You have to realize I’m sitting there with him, for days, and the only way I can escape from that scene is to escape from that scene. That’s where I find the genuine plot, the path with heart. I know he’s in the cave (because I’ve seen it); I don’t know how he escapes (because I’m blinded to this part of the story) – so I have to work it out. I usually get flashes of vision, not understanding or plot or motivations. I’m constantly trying to work out ‘how do I get there, from here’?

 
1 Comment

Posted in Lifesong

 

Behind the words: Plot and Themes in the Tale of the Lifesong

06 Mar

After reading and reviewing both books in my epic fantasy series, David Wagner threw some interesting challenges my way. Join us as we delve into the world behind the words. Required reading for this assignment: The Riddler’s Gift and Second Sight. Deeper into the Tale of the Lifesong we go!

A Clue for the SeekerDW: Did you have the basic arc for the whole tale (From Riddler’s through Second Sight) in mind from the outset, or did you finish Riddler’s Gift first, and then regroup and wonder where you could go from there, for a second book?

Holding onto a master plan when the story is about developing wizards?

This is impossible, because they have the power to change things as they develop, in ways you cannot plan. I wanted to follow their journey, rather than dictate it, and so I had to give them freedom.

If I shoe-horned them into a pre-defined pattern, what would I learn? The only way to retain the integrity of the story was to imagine myself in their position, given their powers, and see what they would do.

So the plot is entirely organic.

This makes my writing process very slow. My coffee generally goes cold. After some time, I am suddenly blind-sided by vision. Occasionally, for fun, I’d finish a chapter and then Zarost would propose ‘How can it possibly get harder? What’s the worst thing that could happen?’ Then I’d write that bit, find myself even deeper and ask ‘how the hell do we get out of here?’ That could take a few days to solve, while Zarost chuckled to himself. Sometimes, I followed my curiosity, as in ‘What’s happening with Ashley?’ If I was really lucky, I’d hear voices, and take dictation – those scenes came out with special resonance and explosive speed.

It got progressively harder to write, until by the fourth movement of Second Sight, I was really beginning to understand Ametheus and was searching for a way to find peace through annihilation. For the record, I didn’t do anything to the chicken, but I enjoy peri-peri.

DW: On the over-arching theme of Chaos vs Order. Did you start with that theme and contemplate which genre would make sense, as far as how best to express your thoughts on it? Or did you decide to write a fantasy novel, and the theme evolved out of the process of fleshing out the characters and the world?

The first question presumes that I planned to express a certain theme. I didn’t; I witnessed it.

You might say it grew out of the world as I explored it, although the three axis magic system was an early concept that comes from being fascinated with three-dimensional mathematics. So Dark and Light were pitted against each other on the first axis in the simplified environment of Eyri, and Chaos and Order were natural adversaries on the third axis in Oldenworld.

I wanted to express the idea of different organizations of the same power, and the freedom of escaping the confines of indoctrination along a certain axis. So far, the second axis is largely unexplored (that of Matter/Energy), and the Lifesong defies classification within the science of the times. But these were very far in the background of my thoughts as I wrote the Lifesong series.

You will find many themes in the Lifesong, depending on what you bring to it as a reader, precisely because I wrote it without the intention to prove a point or present a particular view. I aim for revelation (for myself) rather than trying to disguise some kind of religion (for others).

The inspiring video you posted of Thijme Termaat (I Paint) expresses this perfectly.

You might be able to find themes in his collection. Likewise, the Lifesong fantasy series is a collection of mental paintings. I express what comes through me. The theme is not intended, it is experienced.

So although things like theme, subtext, context and conceptual analysis might make sense in an English literature class, it makes no sense to me as a writer. I deliberately walked a different path for the Lifesong. It has no literary aspirations. It means only what it means to you. It is a creation, rather than a construction.

My life has been a continual search to raise my consciousness, to become, somehow, more. Writing is the best path I have found, given my nature. I suppose I could write in any genre, but I find my muse tends to lead me down pathways that involve magic, music and freedom.

DW: Did you ever consider ending Second Sight with a “Cleansing of the Shire” type of epilogue, where we could return to Eyri to pick up some of the loose ends?
I believe in ending a story when it is done. Epilogues are what come after the story, and I think it’s best to avoid them. A little lingering mystery is good. There are threads that continue beyond Second Sight, and some things I chose not to conclude because once the story gets going they would slow things down and unravel the intensity of what was happening Oldenworld. They can be woven into a sequel, when Tabitha returns to Eyri and finds that things are … altered. So I’ve left these threads to use if they add something to the conflict of the next book, rather than weakening the climax of Second Sight by ‘tying off loose ends’.

 
No Comments

Posted in Lifesong

 

The Lifesong, and the search for Truth

15 Feb

The LifesingerOver the centuries, sages have attempted to pass on the spiritual truths they have discovered in their lives. The problem is that ‘knowledge’ you gain in life is totally subjective. Life is a chaos-system of the highest degree. There are so many variables that affect everyone’s actions that using one’s life to establish ‘truths’ is as hopeless as trying to define the future by the imagined ‘interaction’ of the stars.

I’m an atheist, and yet, The Tale of the Lifesong is deeply spiritual. How can I write it? Because atheism (or any ism or ity) is a point of view, and when I write, I lose myself. I am inspired.

In that state, I cannot instruct or preach. I am an instrument and the Lifesong is the music. I am not trying to offer you the Truth; I am dancing and invite you to join me. Isn’t being alive beautiful?

As to the truths that might lie within the Lifesong, I don’t think life has truths and laws, it is an organic and fluid situation … we are always required to engage the present moment, to evolve; to be alive. Truths and laws are, in a way, laziness, the natural tendency of the mind to simplify things and to find patterns in recurring events. In this respect, ‘truth’ is what we need to guard against. It can lead to narrow-mindedness, arrogance and fundamentalism.

The wisest path I can see is to reflect on one’s situation and try to consider all the consequences before acting. We are always learning, and never ‘know’ the truth of how to live. Intuition can be helpful, but when we believe our intuition guides us to Truth, we end up ‘knowing’ that the earth is flat, that witches must be burned, and that the charming conman really can save us from the impending disaster of our own spiritual annihilation.

What I suspect is that spiritual knowledge is too individual to be taught, but some people have a magic about them, acquired through the choices and actions that form their character. They’ve got it, but they can’t pass it on very easily. That’s why the wizards (the learned) are not nearly as powerful as the sorcerers (the self-taught) in the Tale of the Lifesong. And the Lifesinger simply enlivens, not claiming any knowledge for her own, but willing to share the joy with everyone.

To me, that power is worth more than all of them put together.

 
 

How much editing is too much?

14 Feb

When you write a book about Chaos, you've gotta expect things to get a little weirdI’ve read some beautiful fantasy stories written in strange ways. I think that if the story is great, readers care less about odd grammar and minor typos.

Surely it’s important have a clear voice, but how long should one spend chasing the lost apostrophes in a 650 page epic fantasy novel? Sometimes you need a stray one to fix a wasnt.

It’s possible to become obsessed with making the perfect product, but the premise and style will make or break a fantasy book (see Great ideas sell fantasy books). I’ve spent months editing a manuscript, used a professional editor and a second proofreader and still ended up with typos. Typos in my own books drive me nuts, yet no readers have commented on them (yet! Go on, there’s one over there… but you won’t find it in the ebook any more).

When I worked on The Riddler’s Gift and Second Sight, I became obsessed with editing because there was a traditional print run involved, so there was no opportunity to change the words after publication. In the brand new world of fantasy ebooks, it makes sense to limit the editing to a good final draft and put it into the market to see if the story itself is attractive enough to justify professional copy-editing.

If it starts selling in significant numbers (thousands), the story earns the budget for some obsessing to make a second edition. For self-published or small independent publications, that may well be the point where it gets snapped up by a large commercial publisher anyway. As errors are discovered, the corrections can be incorporated into updates. This strategy of releasing improved editions is quite normal in non-fiction, but is a fairly new idea for novels.

The flaw in this kind of thinking is that as a writer, I can’t release a new fantasy novel in the first place until it’s as good as I can make it. You will always get my best work because I care too much about the story to let it go to the ball in dirty clothes. But as the price of digital content falls, there is ever greater pressure to leave an inch or two of the ballroom floor unpolished.

What keeps the floor shining is the fact that as more readers and authors switch to digital, the advantage lies with books of high quality: it’s the only way to stand out in a market absolutely flooded with content. Your book has to be exceptional, which means applying higher editorial standards than ever before. High-quality ebooks are produced most efficiently by writers who don’t need editing in the first place.

I think editing fiction as a discrete job will become obsolete as the industry of agents, publishers, distributors and bookstores collapses around a simple business model: Authors – Amazon – Readers. In this chain, the readers will set the standards. Exceed their expectations for a given price, and you can shoot straight to the top. Due to low prices, exceptional ebooks have the potential to be supersellers. The average ebook contains something like middle-grade English and more than a few typos. Writing significantly above that standard will lift you out of the masses, so edit until you really believe your story is perfect.

May the best writer win.

 

Are the best fantasy books like Tolkien’s, or not?

02 Feb

The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. TolkienThe danger of writing epic fantasy is that anything you write will be compared with Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. So I thought I’d explain how I tackled this in my new fantasy series.

When I began writing the Tale of the Lifesong, the LOTR movies had not yet appeared, and I hadn’t read the book for more than a decade. ‘There and back again’ had become submerged under many great fantasy books by David Eddings, Stephen Donaldson, Robert Jordan and Robin Hobb: new fantasy written in an appealing modern style. The influence of LOTR was far from my mind.

I like the idea of an old world, mapped out on parchment, stuffed with legends; a place one can have an adventure, possibly find treasure and learn magic. I had this idea before I read Tolkien – as a boy I used to collect maps and go on adventures in the mountains. I was seeking a special treasure, looking for a hidden world, or just enjoying the search. It’s because of that idea that I enjoyed Tolkien’s writing. The idea is fantasy: a world that might be there. Reading about it is the adventure.

However, it is impossible to write epic fantasy without acknowledging the presence of Tolkien. If you’re going to write a new fantasy novel that starts with a map, you have two paths: you can choose to be just like Tolkien, or not at all like Tolkien. To write a book that isn’t like something else works against creativity, as new (forming) ideas are constantly compared to the (formed) masterpiece, and by their insubstantiality, seem inferior. You get a poor kind of mirror-image, written in the negative space that surrounds The Lord of the Rings.

If you try to write just like Tolkien, you get cliché after cliché, because his writing was full of them and now defines the things you can’t use (magic ring, dark lord, orphaned hero, stupid orcs, wise elves, dark riders, ancient language, runes, abandoned underground civilisations, dragons…). Write like Tolkien? Damned if you do; damned if you don’t.

This realisation offered me a sense of freedom: the only sensible response to the paradox was to develop ideas I loved and not worry about Tolkien at all. This left me free to explore the world of myths without debilitating copycat-complex. The funny thing is, as a fantasy author, the further you go down the rabbit hole, the more you begin to encounter the archetypes and ideas that drove the great fantasy stories in the first place. Truly unique ideas that have not already been expressed are very hard to find in that mythic plane of consciousness. Myths, being very old, have been told before. Our bones remember a time when there were dragons.

Is the dragon from a myth, or from imagination?Take the idea of a magical ring, for instance, where all the trouble begins. If you want to contain a magical ability in order to pass it on, you need something you can carry, which could be lost, stolen or coveted. You need a talisman, and none is as simple and elegant as a ring. It is hand-crafted in an almost mystical alchemical process, it is small enough to lose, and the idea of a ring having special power is instantly believable (a wedding ring is more than the metal, there’s the idea that it symbolises some magic, not so?). Magical rings make sense to us, they don’t seem weird.

That’s because the magical ring is not Tolkien’s idea. It goes back beyond the earliest legends. But some critics get as far as the T in Tolkien, and look no further for the source of inspiration, overwhelmed by their amazing powers of deduction. Yes, The Tale of the Lifesong has magic rings, but they are different in important ways.

Tolkien’s ring contained the malice of an evil soul. Tabitha’s ring offers clarity of thought. Tolkien’s ring made the bearer invisible. Tabitha’s ring is only visible to those with talent and has no magical powers beyond being a catalyst. Tolkien’s ring was essentially evil and never changes. Tabitha’s ring is neither good nor evil, it just offers enlightenment. Tolkien’s ring-bearer is on the run to destroy the ring. Tabitha is on the run to understand it. Tolkien’s wizard wore a pointy hat. Tabitha’s wizard has a flat-topped one.

Do you see how futile it is to make comparisons? It’s like Tolkien, but not like Tolkien. One reviewer recently pointed up all the moments when a character in The Riddler’s Gift seemed similar to another in LOTR. Of course they do: at some level all characters share an archetype, so do people, and stories. You can’t write sword and sorcery novels without, um, a sorcerer and ah, a sword-wielder. Another critic complained that Tolkien stalked every page. No doubt he could find echoes of Tolkien in any fantasy. Or, if Tolkienism was absent, decry the paucity of invention by comparison. Cynics try to find faults, and become so absorbed in comparing details they can’t enjoy the mood, atmosphere and world of the story.

Stories should never be read in terms of other stories: they must be read on their own terms. At the heart of what makes a great fantasy novel is a reader who wants to be spellbound. Library Girl Reads recently reviewed the same book and wrote, “Wonderfully crafted”; Mary on Goodreads said, “Full of everything you want in a book. Perfect!” Same story, different readers.

Can you guess who has discovered the secret of reading fantasy? It’s a kind of magic.

 

Imagine a world …

17 Dec

Greg Hamerton | fantasy authorEver wondered how fantasy authors put together an imagined world? Some books can transport you to worlds that seem so real you begin to wonder if the author was really there. What makes them so convincing, and how does an author begin to imagine a world that doesn’t exist? I’ve been living in a fantasy world for the past decade and have learned some strange things about fantasy you probably wouldn’t expect.

Magic is a big part of my writing. Don’t get me wrong, I think science is hugely enlightening. Magic fills the spaces we haven’t found ways to explain yet, and so in some ways magic is very high tech – it describes the talents we might yet discover but don’t know how to access yet. If you’re happy to accept the idea that we don’t know everything yet, there’s a gap for new possibilities and latent talents that could be developed into magic. Once you have magic in your world, it can be great fun! Magic continues to surprise me. It’s very very tricky to work with, because once you allow people to have magical powers, you realise they would use magic to find simpler solutions to just about every challenge they face.

Take teleportation, for example. If you really had this power, you could steal anything, escape from any jail, avoid bullets, travel through the entire universe. There’s not much that could compel you to be in a predicament. Most tension results from not being where you need to be, or not being able to escape. But of course with great power comes great responsibility. If you could do something to stop Hitler, you’d have to do something about it, or live with being an apathetic moron. Teleport in: pull the trigger: teleport out. Great, now you’re a murderer. See how the world has suddenly become so very intense? So as soon as you introduce magic, your whole world and the way you would respond to it changes. This makes the story interesting in unexpected ways, and plays absolute havoc with any kind of plot you invent before you begin telling the story.

Imagine you decided you would have a knight rescue a fair princess trapped in a tower. Then you decide to give your princess the smallest whiff of magical power. By the time your knight in shining has put on all that armour, found his belligerent stallion and completed his quest against the unfair advantages of all his adversaries (who can use magic against him), the princess would have charmed the guard, escaped from her tower, charmed a trader to hide her in his wagon, charmed some men out of their money, charmed some more men to fight for her, swept down from the hills and captured her captors, and locked them in the tower. And she probably thinks the knight is a bit of a ninny. The original plot disappears in a puff of magic.

At which point you realise you have to throw out any preconceptions and submerge yourself in the imagined world, to be true to the story of a mage you must become a mage in that world, to understand how a mage would act you must imagine yourself there, in the flesh, or it’s just not going to be real enough.

To keep track of all the various characters in my books is easy, because it becomes an act of seeing rather than inventing. I see the strangest characters in this hidden world, and I aim to record them as vividly as possible. This helps to differentiate them in my mind. I write in a slightly different style depending on whose eyes I am looking through, so my vocabulary, mindset and pacing will change automatically, but the more committed I am to the ‘imagined world’ the easier it becomes. What’s most important is not to focus on the voice but to keep aiming to tell the story. Occasionally I write something from a narrator’s point of view to foreshadow an event, create atmosphere, or evoke the rhythms of a myth, and that requires the perspective of an observer, but even then it’s the voice of a character who lives in the imagined world … my alter ego, my double, the fantasy author.

We share a mind, but we live different lives. In the real world, I have a house, a car and a business, and probably spend too much time writing about fantasy writing. In the hidden world, I don’t have a name, but I am very much alive. I see wonderful things. I work magic. I write.

So you could say that by writing fantasy I’ve developed a split personality. Greg Hamerton | fantasy author. There’s a dividing line between fantasy and reality that helps to keep half of me sane, the half that needs a name. The other half is a wild-eyed creative. The ultimate achievement is to blur the line and be able to bring the magic back into this world.

 

Great ideas sell fantasy books (in under 10 seconds)

15 Oct

Blink by Malcolm GladwellAs a fantasy author, I’m always intrigued by what makes people buy a book. I observed my buying behaviour in the bookstore this week. Although I was keen to buy a new fantasy novel, I browsed the front-of-store promotion table and ended up buying a short non-fiction book.

That’s when I realised a simple truth: as an author, you’re selling an idea. It’s not the flow of the prose, the colour of the characters, the world-building and dialogue, the placing of the comma and the fine details of grammar (which can be agonised about for days and days). It’s simple. What is the book about? Is that an exciting idea? You can write it any way you wish.

The concept sells the book; the cover must support the style; the blurb must present the idea. Within ten seconds I’ve decided if I’ll buy the book or not. I might analyse or rationalise for a while longer, but the buying decision was made intuitively, right in the beginning, because book buying is a snap decision.

This is borne out by the book I bought: Blink by Malcolm Gladwell.
Read the rest of this entry »

 

Is young adult fiction a fantasy?

26 Sep

Young adult author Greg Hamerton is revealedAlthough I am thirty-seven, I know what it is like to be a young adult. Not because I was one, but because I am one. Here’s the thing – Richard Bach says it best: “Get this in mind early: We never grow up.”

Although a bunch of things have happened, dreams have flashed by and led me up bright peaks and into dark valleys, I still see the ‘world out there’ in the same way, I see ‘myself in here’ the same way. I’ve learned some tools, made some mistakes, changed my plans and interests, for sure, but I am still very much the same ‘me’ I remember, looking out of the window of my soul, age 13.

That is, apparently, the age at which one begins to enter the ‘young adult’ category within fiction, which has been invented to avoid turning away readers by calling the books ‘teenage fiction’. You’ve got to wonder, if booksellers know that you don’t want to read ‘teenage’ books, should anyone be trying to write them? Because you see, you go from ‘being a teenager’ to ‘being a young adult’ in a flash of an eye, and part of that maturing process is through reading, considering how you’d respond to the challenges in the story, and defining your own character. So to become an adult, you need to read adult fiction, or rather, stories.

A large proportion of ‘young adult fiction’ is fantasy fiction: paranormal romance, supernatural thriller, magical series, myths and monsters. Why? Because it’s exciting, and imaginative, and bursting with possibility. Anything can happen in a these vast new worlds, and this matches your optimism about what might become of you and your life. Great things await just around the corner, challenges have cosmic importance; you are vital and alive.

For some of us, that doesn’t change … or we don’t want it to … and so fantasy is our kind of fiction. We give our writers permission to bring back dreams and visions unaltered by the mundane reality that we seem to live in. Some writers can cleverly weave their tales into the fabric of our modern world, so we can share in the wonder of the possible worlds beyond, or gain some glimpse of the magic that lies beneath our fingers. This doesn’t make fantasy ‘young adult’ reading; it’s merely a category of story.

Categories may be helpful to know where to put the book in the bookstore, but they are also harmful if we use them to generalise. If you read one bad horror book and decide to avoid the genre, you’ll miss all the mastery of Stephen King. If you judge fantasy on the basis of one pile of dungeonpulp you’ll miss the wonder of Hobb, Donaldson, and a hundred others. Slapping ‘young adult’ on a book doesn’t tell me anything, apart from the fact that it probably doesn’t contain graphic sex, psychopathic gore or the glorification of drugs and violence. My novels are likely to always be suitable for young adults, just as they are suitable for old adults. The ‘adult’ elements are often better told through subtle storytelling anyway. Good stories speak to the soul.